There are several ways in which to classify the difficulty of mountains. Climbbybike has developed its own formula, in an effort to reflect the most important aspects
in a well-weighted manner, the climbbybike difficulty index.

(H*100/D)*2 + H²/D + D/1000 + (T-1000)/100

Whereby: H = difference in height; D = distance in meters; T = top of mountain in meters

The last part of the formula does only apply to mountains above 1000 meters.

Of course, we are aware this formula does not take all aspects into account, like the distinction between steep passages and moderate passages, the weather circumstances, condition of the road etc. . Yet, we believe that the use of only the main variables (height, height difference and distance, all other variables are derived thereof) cater for the best formula and index to compare climbs with eachother.

Other variables like the distinction between steep and moderate passages are factors which are dependent on the individual cyclist. E.g. a 20 km mountain with an average % of 5% can be easy to climb for a tall person of 80 kg+ if there are no passages of 10% plus, while a 65kg cyclist might have no problem at all with the steep passages.

The height of the climb on the other hand is also weighed into the formula, as oxygen is available in lesser amounts in the higher zones. Therefore, this aspect is only taken into account starting from 1000 meter above sea-level.

To conclude: for the reasons above, the climbbybike difficulty index can only be considered a measure of comparison and the individual profile of each climb should be consulted to get a good idea of the individual difficulty of a climb. All these profiles are available on climbbybike.com. Additional information on road conditions, typical weather conditions etc can be found on the climb pages as well, with the general information or in the stories and comments of the climbers.

The new formula is active on climbbybike since November 3, 2007. (slightly adapted 5/08/2012)

Other formulas to calculate the difficulty of climbs are:

Whereby: H = difference in height; D = distance in meters; T = top of mountain in meters

The

D - Difficulty rating: outcome of the Formula

d - total difference in altitude (meters)

di - difference in altitude between two points (meters) referring to the i-th interval of the climb

P - avg. gradient expressed as Percentage (%)

pi - gradient of the i-th interval of the climb (%)

L - entire Length of the climb (Km)

li - length of the i-th interval of the climb (Km)

Whereby the principles followed working out the Formula (proceeding from the old well-known elaboration: D=(P*P*L)/10 + 4*P) are four:

- to give as much prominence as possible to steep gradients; thus avoid to calculate only average gradients over the entire climb, which would attenuate the importance of the sharpest intervals. Each interval (defined mainly by homogeneous gradient) will be taken into consideration separetely, and the results will be added as the final step of the operation;
- equal slopes (i.e.: eventually the same climb), even if considered as parts of different courses, should provide self-consistent results. E.g.: check the database for these italian climbs: Prada Alta and Punta Veleno. Punta Veleno should include the entire difficulty of Prada Alta, adding eventually some more difficulty points being the same climb with ADDITIONAL tracts - although easier, anyway rising;
- the subdivision into intervals should be the least arbitrary;
- in a theoretically homogeneous climb - in which the average gradient is equal to the partial gradient for every interval - the old and the new formulas should provide the same outcomes.

The Scanuppia Malga Palazzo in Italy. One of the most difficult climbs in Europe according to all formulas.

The Pico de Ariero on the island of Madeira (Portugal), one of the hardest.

The profile of the Mount Washington in the United States (New Hampshire). The hardest in the States, together with Mount Haleakala on Hawaii.

Climbbybikers gehen zum:

© climbbybike™ Alle Rechte vorbehalten 2005 -